The Journal of Eurasian Economies accepts and commits to conform
to the international academic publication ethics. Accordingly, the
Journal is obliged to execute its publication process in this
ethical framework. In this context, the Journal expects that all
participants in the publication process (authors, researchers,
peer reviewers, editors, publisher and readers) take
responsibility and conform to the ethics rules.
Guidelines and policies made by the Committee on Publication
Ethics (COPE), were taken into consideration in determining the
ethical principles of the journal (JOBS). (further information).
Ethical Duties and Responsibilities of Editors
Editors are responsible for each article published in the
journal. In this context, the general roles and responsibilities
of the editors are as follows:
- to make an effort to meet the needs and requests of authors
and readers for information related to the journal,
- continuously contribute to improving the journal,
- ensure the quality of articles published in the journal,
- ensure the authors’ freedom of expression
- non-compromise of intellectual property rights and ethical
standards,
- being transparent in expressing the issues of correction,
explanation, apology, and publication retractions fort he
articles published in the journal,
- not demanding article processing charge (APC) from authors.
Duties and Responsibilities to Readers
- readers should be informed about the financing of the studies
or the role of funders for the study.
- editors should consider that the articles in the journal
contribute to the academic literature and should be original.
Duties and Responsibilities to Authors
- editors’ decisions to accept or reject a paper for publication
should be based only on the paper’s importance, originality and
clarity, and the study’s relevance to the remit of the journal.
- an author guide should be published covering each subject
expected from authors in detail.
- the principles regarding the review and evaluation process
applied in the journal should be published, and the editors
should stick to these principles. It should be ensured that these
principles apply to all authors in the same way.
Duties and Responsibilities to Reviewers
- editors must respect the reviewer's decisions unless they
contain serious mistakes.
- providing information and guidance to reviewers who may need
it during the review process.
- choose reviewers according to the subject of the study.
- editors must consider whether there is a conflict of interest
between the authors and the reviewers.
- keeping the identity information of reviewers confidential
during the review.
- encouraging reviewers to be neutral and objective.
- to make reminder notifications to the reviewers assigned to
the articles sent by authors.
- striving to create a large pool of reviewers.
Duties and Responsibilities to Editorial Board
- should be in regular interaction with the editorial board.
- editorial board members should be assigned from academics who
can contribute to the journal and have the right qualifications.
Protection of Personal Information
Editors are supposed to protect the personal information related
to the subjects or visuals in the studies being reviewed and to
reject the study if there is no documentation of the subjects'
consent. Furthermore, editors are supposed to protect the personal
information of the authors, reviewers, and readers.
Ethical Rules and Protection of Human and Animal Rights
Editors are supposed to protect human and animal rights in the
studies being reviewed and must reject the experimental studies
which do not have ethical and related committee’s approval about
the population given in such studies.
Also:
- ethics committee approval must be obtained for studies
conducted in all disciplines including social sciences and for
studies on clinical and experimental human and animals requiring
ethical committee decision, this approval must be specified and
documented in the article.
- Information on ethics committee approval should be provided to
editors, reviewers, and authors.
- a statement of compliance with research and publication ethics
should be included in the submitted manuscript.
- in articles requiring ethics committee approval, information
about the approval (name of the ethics board, date, and number)
should be included in the methods section.
- copyright regulations must be respected for intellectual and
artistic works given publicity in articles.
Plagiarism Detection
For each manuscript uploaded to the journal, a similarity report
(intihal.net) must be uploaded separately. Manuscripts with a
similarity rate of over 20% will not be accepted for the review
process.
Ethical Duties and Responsibilities of Reviewers
- review in an unbiased and confidential manner.
- review the manuscript objectively and only in terms of its
content and ensure that nationality, gender, religious and
political beliefs, and economic apprehension do not influence the
review.
- review the manuscript they have agreed to review on time and
following the ethical rules stated above.
Ethical Duties and Responsibilities of Authors
- authors must make the in-text and end-text references wholly
and accurately.
- people who have not contributed to the study at the
intellectual level should not be indicated as an author.
- at the end of the manuscript, authors should present the
contribution rates of authors, supports and acknowledgments, and
conflict of interest among authors if necessary.
- authors can not submit their manuscript more than one journal
at a time. The manuscripts sent to the journal should be those
that were not published in another journal before.
- if the manuscripts submitted by the authors to the journals
are a part of/ or derived from a postgraduate thesis, or
presented as a proceeding at a symposium/congress, this should be
stated on the first page of the article.